#JSON PACKET SENDER JQUERY PRO#
#JSON PACKET SENDER JQUERY DOWNLOAD#

CouchDB Weekly News, Septem– CouchDB Blog - Often CouchDB is used to stream results from a view query to a browser.– Clustering Markers on Google Maps – Part 1 - Josh Zeigler’s article on “How Big is TOO BIG for JSON?”.large dataset for parsing in webpage | Technology & Programming - I considered loading it as a giant JSON array, but this page makes me think that might not work….

The purpose of this test was to help identify a general maximum number for conversations around large record sets with JSON. The maximum number of usable records I would push to a browser would be around 25,000 records (3.87MB). Keep in mind there are numerous factors to keep in mind when determining how many records you should return to your JavaScript application.

If anyone knows as to why IE failed to load the 500,000 record object, let me know.įrom this test, I am considering the sweet spot to be around 10,000 records at (1.55MB). I couldn’t find anything pointing to a size limitation here. The most interesting part for me was that Internet Explorer failed to load the object after the 250,000 record test.

#JSON PACKET SENDER JQUERY DOWNLOAD#

* Download time is estimated using Numion’s Download Time Calculator, based on 1.544Mbps connection in (mm:ss) format.Īs you can see from my results, the browsers were all surprisingly close to one another. The following are the results from the tests: Recordsĭata failed to load and browser became unresponsive. Most of the “During Load” results are untestable as I am not quick enough to tell if the browser is responsive in 200ms. I wanted to see if it was possible to load large objects while still keeping the browser usable and how the browser performed after the object was loaded.

#JSON PACKET SENDER JQUERY PRO#

Memory was taken from each browsers “tab” or renderer process, with the exception of Firefox which was taken from the single core process. These tests were run on my 2011 2.2GHz i7 MacBook Pro with 8GB of RAM.ĭuring the test, I spent some time seeing how usable each browser was while loading the object. Each sample was taken from a fresh process. Memory usage was taken after the object loaded, while the browser was at rest. Since network traffic can be deceiving, I chose to load the JSON file from the local file system and provide estimated download times from Numion’s Download Time Calculator at. The results are using the operating system’s process monitors and each browser’s developer tools. Originally ten (10) samples per browser were taken, but it quickly became obvious that the data wasn’t changing enough to make the extra effort necessary. The following is an example JSON object used in this test:įive (5) samples per browser were taken to create the averages.

The core HTML file only loads the JSON file and sets it to the testData variable. Each record averages around 200 bytes a piece. The JSON samples were pulled from customer data in sizes ranging from 1 record to 1,000,000 records. At some point, I would also like to see how this translates to mobile devices. I wanted find the “sweet spot” for speaking to the maximum usable size of a JSON object. So I decided to test desktop browsers to see how they handle JSON at different sizes.

In the context of a desktop browser, there are many factors to answer this question that include file, memory and object size as well as transport and loading time. This generated another question: “Just how big is TOO BIG for JSON? Yesterday, I blogged about “ When To Use Pagination in REST Resources” and advocated for better UX Design instead of pagination. Most developers know by now that JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is the best way to work with data sets in JavaScript.

Json packet sender jquery